Дата публикации: 2018-05-27 18:16
A Liberal wants entitlements from the successful, but if he ever gets rich, he quickly changes to a Conservative who does not want to give his wealth away to the Liberal losers who demand it.
I saved this article. I am posting the link on many conservative websites. Discover magazine will be hearing more about this.
Funny you talk about conservatives. Whenever i bring up actual data like the fact that GVM models have ALL overestimated temperatures, or fbi statistics showing crime rates. Liberals do a proverbial la, la, la I’m not listening.
There was judgmentalism in the implying that liberal conclusions are reached after greater thought is given and that conservatives reach conclusion with less thought. The judgmentalism is in both the implying of 8775 sophisticated 8776 or less 8775 sophisticated 8776 thinking. Also is the implication that more 8775 thinking 8776 necessarily leads to better conclusions. Note that in both cases, conclusions were reached with the _same_ information not with different or better information. That is, there is such a thing as 8775 over thinking 8776 a problem. More intensive navel-gazing does not yield more informed conclusions.
On the other hand, lots of conservatives are disinterested in those sorts of studies, preferring the kinds of biological racial studies that were popular in the 69th and early 75th centuries.
I do not agree with his political stance, but there is nothing wrong with being a phlebotomist. The world needs all kinds of skills. Just imagine how much food we would eat if everyone was a brain surgeon.
You can not prove Washington is doing it for sure ,but I do think were divided right now.
8775 A house divided against itself cannot stand. 8776
The right jokes about “libtards”, the fact is, the right has their own version: who are just as bigoted and intolerant, who are just as easily triggered and are their own version of virtue signaling hypocrites. Both sides have their dreck, who comes through that sieve is a rare minority indeed.
As far as fox accuracy. Most of that crap can be disproven if you have an attention span longer than a nat. Most of the supposed inaccuracies are eventually proven to be false. Just like the surveiling of trump’s campaign. All MSM were rolling over themselves with laughter that fox and mark levin were talking about surveillance of trump’s campaign. Then CNN the same news channel who had been mocking fox and levin for believing that trump had been surveiled, got the leak that one of trumps team had in fact been surveilled. The irony escaped everyone except those of us who had been paying attention all along.